First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

[UnstucK]

This is an official announce , the Royal Hack v69 and v71 is detected so please do not use it anymore !

New update will come very soon !

-> Any members banned from shoutbox because of reporting/talking about VAC Detections will be unbanned of course and they have to know that I'm sorry because they were right ! I acted like that because it's not new that some people makes threads about fake detections to get some free steam accounts or whatever ...

[s7rik3]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

hahahaha i just used it, fml.

[udevil_666]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

ive been using it on a fresh account, my advice, fov 360 smooth 0 and a bit of namestealing and speed hack, i hadnt raged in ages, put a smile on my face evn thou i know the vac hammer is comming. good to know for sure that it is detected so i dont use it on any other accounts..

[randomiser]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

yeah i just got vacced fuck my life. can someone swap me any account with my other non-vacced.. it has css.. but it's banned on ONE australian server that i want to play

[igember]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

5 Years UnstucK, thats insane! all other hack company is detected every half year but Royal Hack isnt, 5 Years detection delay but i think this will be the only detection as well, but i think that Vac updated and they find "Ring0" and hardware cheats. They have improved alot and we all see how much Css updates it is now and also steam updates so they have maybe updated Vac also.

Best regards
igember

Ps, selling 2 steam accounts with 14 games on from 2008 including css for all people that got banned...

[s3b]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

well not all ;)

[Iaa_1]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Is there a compensation to banned people?

[s3b]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Is there a compensation to banned people?

there's none who's gonna know the hack can be 100% sure that it's gonna be vac ud for 1000000000 years also it's stated in the user agreement @ royalhack.org

[Rudolf123]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Is there a compensation to banned people?

There is nothing given to banned people except our apologies.

This is really sad, but I am looking forward to see what Royalhacks protection will be like in the future.

@UnstucK, is VAC now detecting ring0, or what happended?

[igember]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

just founded this, idk if its correct.

The hack itself will run in ring 0, but sooner or later it has to modify the game's memory. And that's detectable.

And on an other forum i saw this

VAC scans kernel functions now

Best regards

[scorer]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Same question of me
what happened
Im sry that I spammend this a lil bit on shoutbox, but I rly was sure ;/
please unban me as fast as possible
still it would be nice, if you could give us information, why we are banned.
greets

[Sidous]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Dunno - some ppl say VAC detects via the size of the menu. (i dont rly beleave that but ... it could be)

But if (!) VAC detects via ring0 scan they would have to update their GTC (general terms and conditions).

[scorer]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

some1 checked if they didnt? :D

[lolimsoasd]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

We could sue them get big money

[MaareK]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

maybe it is the complete new NO RECOIL system at royal hack since the v69 ??

btw: congratulation for the long time that was rh VAC PROOF, good job ven. ;)

best regards,

maarek

[UnstucK]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

maybe it is the complete new NO RECOIL system at royal hack since the v69 ??

btw: congratulation for the long time that was rh VAC PROOF, good job ven. ;)

best regards,

maarek

Royal Hack is not like EA , RH was not detected because of fixed feature or added feature (lol) !

Anyway more informations will come very soon !

ps: yes 5 years of royal proofen :)

[Guest]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

We could sue them get big money

[eragon sk]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Please READ THIS.

Would it not be better to code NEW external hack in ring0 that uses hardware overlays?
I mean, every cheat is at the beginning UD, but after some time it will be again detected.
Ring0 hides our cheat, as long, as the memory in game will be changed and that will lead to ban(correct if im wrong).
At this point, fixing hack and make it UD again maybe would be for the anticheat just little problem before detecting it again.
So what do you thing about coding NEW hack that will be undetected again for maybe more than 5 years?

A little detection because of mistake of coder doesnt matter, (if there is some mistake in source) since he does really good job, thanks v3n0ma :)

Something like THIS:

[s3b]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

I'm quoting organner now:

VAC is not targeting any ring0 components. Like i previously said ring0 is not a magical solution for every one*.

Hack still has to be designed in a smart and non invasive way.

Also each kernel mode driver is different, so i cannot really say anything about RHs driver as i didn't analyze it.

For example Orgia & Framework could be also detected by VAC2/3 if i didn't follow rules from above, but as we all know this never happened in past 6 years.

* - EA claims now to build a ring0 driver ( few months ago they said they will never do it because their hacks are already very secure and it would be "shipping a junk to their customers". I stay cool because 3-4 years ago they also promised league hack. All people blind fooled by their promises paid 250USD and still wait.. It doesn't seems they are going to release it before their company goes down. So this driver is probably another sweet lie to keep their young frustrated customer base ) and im 100% sure that even if they realize this, their cheat will still get detected from time to time, but it won't really matter for them anymore, as after 10th detection they will probably stop count it.

[scorer]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

I rly like this post of organner
where did he post it? :o

[eragon sk]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

with ring0 I mean kernel omg.
by the way if u saw that vid, I think you would understand what valkyrie was...

[s3b]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

I rly like this post of organner
where can I find it? :D

I don't want to advice rh users to the site but if you aren't retarded you can probably find the site without a link

[FluR0]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

I rly like this post of organner
where can I find it? :D

On his forums?

[Rudolf123]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Nice to see that Organner shows some respect :)

[FluR0]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Nice to see that Organner shows some respect :)

Hes quite a nice guy IMO. I suppose if you make a hack that remains un-detected for five years you earn the respect of a few people :D

[s3b]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

I have no problem with RH.

If last detection was really in 2007 then its just a bad luck.

They are still way better than EA which is vac detected every couple of months.

Also they don't feed customers with sweet lies like EA do.

5charlol

[mencore]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Please READ THIS.

Would it not be better to code NEW external hack in ring0 that uses hardware overlays?
I mean, every cheat is at the beginning UD, but after some time it will be again detected.
Ring0 hides our cheat, as long, as the memory in game will be changed and that will lead to ban(correct if im wrong).
At this point, fixing hack and make it UD again maybe would be for the anticheat just little problem before detecting it again.
So what do you thing about coding NEW hack that will be undetected again for maybe more than 5 years?

A little detection because of mistake of coder doesnt matter, (if there is some mistake in source) since he does really good job, thanks v3n0ma :)

Something like THIS:

Why the Hell should it be ring0 when it would be external? That just does not make any sense when we are talking of VAC-server hack. Maybe against some league anti-cheats but RH was never meant to be leaguehack. Hardware overlay is also pointless if you dont happen to own an ATI-card or then i've done something horribly wrong when I was coding one.
Not to mention that external is a pain in the ass and it would drop the quality of RH by 75%.

[FluR0]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Why the Hell should it be ring0 when it would be external? That just does not make any sense when we are talking of VAC-server hack. Maybe against some league anti-cheats but RH was never meant to be leaguehack. Hardware overlay is also pointless if you dont happen to own an ATI-card or then i've done something horribly wrong when I was coding one.
Not to mention that external is a pain in the ass and it would drop the quality of RH by 75%.

I saw EA's External Hack injecting into Intel integrated GPUs, but that was just by a logo in the tray, so I cant confirm it.

[eragon sk]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Why the Hell should it be ring0 when it would be external? That just does not make any sense when we are talking of VAC-server hack. Maybe against some league anti-cheats but RH was never meant to be leaguehack. Hardware overlay is also pointless if you dont happen to own an ATI-card or then i've done something horribly wrong when I was coding one.
Not to mention that external is a pain in the ass and it would drop the quality of RH by 75%.

Thats the whole point of it! Making it better then every else could, and trying to make one of best security hags, that sounds good hm?
RH is already the best(or maybe second I dunno,,, .pl guy......) with making it UD for 5 years! maybe(and I mean MAYBE) with adding league support RH could put the prices higher than it is now, for example:
-RH with vac support only = 80€
-RH with BETA 3rd party anticheat = 120-140€

with BETA am I meaning, that v3n could try to make some more protections ON OUR OWN RISK :D (and he would be also paid for it.......)

[BigBen]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

when I m unbanned for talking in shoutbox?^^ and why is it so difficult to say someone that it isnt allowed to talk about the vac ban?

[xst]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Thats the whole point of it! Making it better then every else could, and trying to make one of best security hags, that sounds good hm?
RH is already the best(or maybe second I dunno,,, .pl guy......) with making it UD for 5 years! maybe(and I mean MAYBE) with adding league support RH could put the prices higher than it is now, for example:
-RH with vac support only = 80€
-RH with BETA 3rd party anticheat = 120-140€

with BETA am I meaning, that v3n could try to make some more protections ON OUR OWN RISK :D (and he would be also paid for it.......)

Don't want to interrupt your ideas floating but what do you think should ppl get that already own a 10 year subscription?

[Rudolf123]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

when I m unbanned for talking in shoutbox?^^ and why is it so difficult to say someone that it isnt allowed to talk about the vac ban?

It wasn't difficult for us to tell that is wasn't allowed to talk about VAC detection. It was just difficult for you to read it at the sticky

[Psychologie]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

fuck it :D
but.. which hack can say "our hack was 5 years undetected" !?
royalhack :]

[MaareK]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

fuck it :D
but.. which hack can say "our hack was 5 years undetected" !?
royalhack :]

it is the truth with the 5 years and it is bad for our new subscriber, very bad luck :D

best regards,

maarek

[Guest]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

fuck it :D
but.. which hack can say "our hack was 5 years undetected" !?
royalhack :]

organner.

[Rudolf123]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

We could really use MADDOG WITH HIS HL2H NAOW!

[BigBen]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

when I m unbanned for talking in shoutbox?^^ and why is it so difficult to say someone that it isnt allowed to talk about the vac ban?

It wasn't difficult for us to tell that is wasn't allowed to talk about VAC detection. It was just difficult for you to read it at the sticky

allways a friendly answer :)

[FluR0]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Whats fucking epic about this, No one is angry. I'm happy because of 5 years of VAC Proofens.

[Psychologie]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

hey i write in another hack forum for css (german community) that royalhack is detected after 5 years
i think the team (coder staffs and more) does not like royalhack.
1 teammember wirte that rh isnt detected first time because rh was detected beginning 2011 too.
then another teammember write

"omg as first they sayd its undetected too but there were a lot of bans"

[Rudolf123]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

allways a friendly answer :)

I'm sorry :P

[BigBen]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

im not angry about vac detection .sure 5 years is a great performance:D
im angry that amdins ban for something like "talking about vac detection in the shoutbox"

[FluR0]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

im not angry about vac detection .sure 5 years is a great performance:D
im angry that amdins ban for something like "talking about vac detection in the shoutbox"

Its justified if you could clearly see the sticky in the shoutbox.

[BigBen]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

I'm sorry :P

:) dont want anybody insult...

[MaareK]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

hey i write in another hack forum for css (german community) that royalhack is detected after 5 years
i think the team (coder staffs and more) does not like royalhack.
1 teammember wirte that rh isnt detected first time because rh was detected beginning 2011 too.
then another teammember write

"omg as first they sayd its undetected too but there were a lot of bans"

november 2010? it was not an offical detection by VAC. 5-6 people are banned and i use this release at november 2010 each day and i'm still not banned.

best regards,

maarek

[BigBen]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Its justified if you could clearly see the sticky in the shoutbox.

now i cant...^^

[xst]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

hey i write in another hack forum for css (german community) that royalhack is detected after 5 years
i think the team (coder staffs and more) does not like royalhack.
1 teammember wirte that rh isnt detected first time because rh was detected beginning 2011 too.
then another teammember write

"omg as first they sayd its undetected too but there were a lot of bans"

y do you care about what others say? it is the first official detection since 5 years! the last one was just a mistake of V3N...

[FluR0]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

now i cant...^^

Haha, All chill. Hope its just a temp ban.

[BigBen]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Haha, All chill. Hope its just a temp ban.

y hopefully ;)

[Paranoid]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

Im not angry why? 5 YEARS VAC UD;) RESPECT VENOMA

all other cheat like EA ! gets vac bans every 1-3 months...RH BEST!!!

Playing with RH since im joined on the forum with breaks.(ca. 2 months) and then 8 months played with rh every day.

[BigBen]

Re: First VAC Detection after 5 years ...

i think nobody is angry about the vac detection^^