Simplex FULL

[Forza1]

I like sfab1 (the coder), he's a nice guy and I would normally feel bad doing this. I cracked these cheats a few weeks ago and had no intentions of releasing them. That is until Simplex got detected and Avaster, in all his wisdom, decided to tell the entire community and anyone that would listen that the only reason they were detected is that I sent the cheats to Steam. Well, Avaster, if I wanted to "get you banned" I would never send it to Steam - I would just release it to the public and that's what I have decided to do. I have left you alone constantly and you think it's wise to continuously bring me into your shitty sites drama that I'm not interested in.

Seriously, you KNEW that I had your cheats cracked, yet you continue to pull me into your drama and blatantly lie to your customers blaming ME because your shit gets detected. *tsk tsk* That's not going to happen anymore. I gave you one final warning on your website and was greeted with a nice ban. I hope it was worth it. I hate getting involved in stupid eDrama, especially with pay sites, I generally just leave everyone alone as long as they leave me alone. I have given you WAY too many chances so I hope you enjoy your reward, non stop cracks until I get bored - if I get bored.

Download

VirusTotal - 2/44
Jotti - 0/19

PS: I can't seem to find an attach button here. Do I not have privileges? If not could someone please attach it, I would prefer it to be attached than an external link on SendSpace because of how abused DMCA is.

[Legitplayer]

Re: Simplex FULL

Naughty Naughty.

[Forza1]

Re: Simplex FULL

Naughty Naughty.

I specifically told Avaster that all he had to do was apologize publicly and admit he lied about my involvement in the detection Simplex faced. That's not much to ask. He lied to the entire community and what makes it worst is he tried to tarnish my reputation while doing it, KNOWING that I had already cracked all Simplex's cheats. He knew that he either apologized and admitted he lied or I would release the cracks - I told him that specifically. He chose his own path.

[Legitplayer]

Re: Simplex FULL

I specifically told Avaster that all he had to do was apologize publicly and admit he lied about my involvement in the detection Simplex faced. That's not much to ask. He lied to the entire community and what makes it worst is he tried to tarnish my reputation while doing it, KNOWING that I had already cracked all Simplex's cheats. He knew that he either apologized and admitted he lied or I would release the cracks - I told him that specifically. He chose his own path.

Well you cracking the cheat and him knowing sparks a little curiosity on what you're planning on doing with the .dll, then the cheat getting detected made Avaster assume you released the .dll. He made a thread speaking what he thought happened, later that day or next day is when everyone found out Vac had updated and all cheat sites had gotten Vac Detected.
Not trying to start anything since you and I don't have any beef, hope you understand. ;)

[Forza1]

Re: Simplex FULL

Well you cracking the cheat and him knowing sparks a little curiosity on what you're planning on doing with the .dll, then the cheat getting detected made Avaster assume you released the .dll. He made a thread speaking what he thought happened, later that day or next day is when everyone found out Vac had updated and all cheat sites had gotten Vac Detected.
Not trying to start anything since you and I don't have any beef, hope you understand. ;)

I completely understand that, I would have assumed the exact same thing in his position. I am by no means at all mad over the fact that he thought I sent the DLL's to VAC, which I would NEVER do by the way. I am, however, upset that he took it upon himself to tell everyone it was my fault the cheat got detected without a shred of evidence. He used me as a scapegoat because he wanted some kind of excuse for the detection rather than accepting responsibility and getting the problem resolved. The reason I released these cheats is because I offered him a chance to redeem himself and his reply was to ban me.

I told him that the detection had nothing to do with me, there was a major VAC update, and he needs to make a public apology for accusing me and admit that it was NOT me that got it banned. Had he replied to me and said he's sorry and that it was a misunderstanding then I wouldn't have any problem at all. I have had these cheats cracked for a long time now, as you can see from the date, and haven't released a SINGLE one, and never intended to. Even the CSGO crack wasn't released by me, I sent it to ph0ne and one of his buddies posted it on the myg0t forums - NOT ME. All I wanted was a public apology for writing unjustified libel about me and he couldn't even do that so I see no reason why I should keep the cheats private. Avaster brought this upon himself, I gave him a very clear opportunity to avoid this and he chose to ignore it.

PS: Oh yea and just for the record I only cracked the cheats out of curiosity of how tough of security the loader had. I told this to both sfab1 and Avaster, there was never any intention to release anything. This goes for about 5 other cheats I have cracked and not released.

[Tom]

Re: Simplex FULL

I specifically told Avaster that all he had to do was apologize publicly and admit he lied about my involvement in the detection Simplex faced. That's not much to ask. He lied to the entire community and what makes it worst is he tried to tarnish my reputation while doing it, KNOWING that I had already cracked all Simplex's cheats. He knew that he either apologized and admitted he lied or I would release the cracks - I told him that specifically. He chose his own path.

Wait you are releasing cracked hacks and you've posted it in the coding section with the sub forum for leaked src code. And you claim you done all this crap i couldn't really care about and yet you post completely in wrong area of forum............and you want to be able to bypass vac proofens???? Good 1 :D made me laugh.

Tom,

[Forza1]

Re: Simplex FULL

Wait you are releasing cracked hacks and you've posted it in the coding section with the sub forum for leaked src code. And you claim you done all this crap i couldn't really care about and yet you post completely in wrong area of forum............and you want to be able to bypass vac proofens???? Good 1 :D made me laugh.

Tom,

Your English makes no sense, you might want to reword that statement. Are you implying that I posted in the wrong forum? Whatever, an admin can move it if he wants. Also your last statement...

............and you want to be able to bypass vac proofens???? Good 1 :D made me laugh.

Makes the least amount of sense. What exactly are you trying to say?

[Tom]

Re: Simplex FULL

It makes perfect sense your stupidity and what you are trying to prove here is beyond me. All i see is alot of .dll files in a thread that u claim to of leaked. Which you posted in the wrong section of the forum which i kindly moved for you and you claim you can code. When you can't even read forum headers.

That easier for you MATE?

[Forza1]

Re: Simplex FULL

Your location is Britain but surely English isn't your first language? Let's go through the list...

-You say I claim to have leaked these cheats implying that I didn't do it myself. Well, do you see them anywhere else on the internet? Do you know of anyone else that has cracked them? Do you think that someone else cracked them and just gave me "permission" to post them AND take credit for them? Clearly I cracked them myself.

-You also say that I claim I can code quite sarcastically. Well, first of all I never claimed that a single time. Cracking cheats take far more reverse engineering skills than coding skills. However, believe it or not, I can code. Do you visit any other cheat sites or are you stuck in the RoyalHack bubble? Nearly any known coder will tell you I know what I'm doing.

-How does posting a cracked cheat in "HL2 Engine Games" make any more sense than posting in the "Leaked" forum of the "Coding" section? The section name is not "Source code", it's "Coding", which is a very broad subject. Posting a crack in the "Coding->Leaked" section makes FAR more sense than posting it in the "HL2 Engine Games" section. This goes back to your sub-par English.

I could go on insulting you but judging from your English skills it will most likely be a waste of energy typing so I'll just end it there.

[Legitplayer]

Re: Simplex FULL

I completely understand that, I would have assumed the exact same thing in his position. I am by no means at all mad over the fact that he thought I sent the DLL's to VAC, which I would NEVER do by the way. I am, however, upset that he took it upon himself to tell everyone it was my fault the cheat got detected without a shred of evidence. He used me as a scapegoat because he wanted some kind of excuse for the detection rather than accepting responsibility and getting the problem resolved. The reason I released these cheats is because I offered him a chance to redeem himself and his reply was to ban me.

I told him that the detection had nothing to do with me, there was a major VAC update, and he needs to make a public apology for accusing me and admit that it was NOT me that got it banned. Had he replied to me and said he's sorry and that it was a misunderstanding then I wouldn't have any problem at all. I have had these cheats cracked for a long time now, as you can see from the date, and haven't released a SINGLE one, and never intended to. Even the CSGO crack wasn't released by me, I sent it to ph0ne and one of his buddies posted it on the myg0t forums - NOT ME. All I wanted was a public apology for writing unjustified libel about me and he couldn't even do that so I see no reason why I should keep the cheats private. Avaster brought this upon himself, I gave him a very clear opportunity to avoid this and he chose to ignore it.

PS: Oh yea and just for the record I only cracked the cheats out of curiosity of how tough of security the loader had. I told this to both sfab1 and Avaster, there was never any intention to release anything. This goes for about 5 other cheats I have cracked and not released.

Ahh well it wasn't Avaster who banned you. It was a moderator :]

[Forza1]

Re: Simplex FULL

Avaster was online when I posted it so I assume it was him that read it but if it was a moderator than he's a complete idiot. He must have read it and if he had any kind of common sense whatsoever he would have contacted Avaster before banning me.

[Legitplayer]

Re: Simplex FULL

Avaster was online when I posted it so I assume it was him that read it but if it was a moderator than he's a complete idiot. He must have read it and if he had any kind of common sense whatsoever he would have contacted Avaster before banning me.

he just gave you 3 infractions lol

[Forza1]

Re: Simplex FULL

Well it's too late at this point, I don't know what kind of idiot moderator would ban a user after seeing a post specifically saying that I have the cheats cracked and I expect an apology for being wrongly blamed for the detection. That's almost asking for the cheats to be released. Honestly it's not even that big of a deal anyway considering they're detected regardless.

[Sfab]

Re: Simplex FULL

Well, shit happens i see, just any excuse is fine to make em public.

[mencore]

Re: Simplex FULL

Your location is Britain but surely English isn't your first language? Let's go through the list...

-You say I claim to have leaked these cheats implying that I didn't do it myself. Well, do you see them anywhere else on the internet? Do you know of anyone else that has cracked them? Do you think that someone else cracked them and just gave me "permission" to post them AND take credit for them? Clearly I cracked them myself.

-You also say that I claim I can code quite sarcastically. Well, first of all I never claimed that a single time. Cracking cheats take far more reverse engineering skills than coding skills. However, believe it or not, I can code. Do you visit any other cheat sites or are you stuck in the RoyalHack bubble? Nearly any known coder will tell you I know what I'm doing.

-How does posting a cracked cheat in "HL2 Engine Games" make any more sense than posting in the "Leaked" forum of the "Coding" section? The section name is not "Source code", it's "Coding", which is a very broad subject. Posting a crack in the "Coding->Leaked" section makes FAR more sense than posting it in the "HL2 Engine Games" section. This goes back to your sub-par English.

I could go on insulting you but judging from your English skills it will most likely be a waste of energy typing so I'll just end it there.

Tom is right, Coding -sections "Leaked" -subforum is strictly meant for leaked source codes, not binaries.
https://royalhack.xyz/upload/showthr...IMPORTANT-Read <- rules that make it pretty clear.

However this thread is now at correct place and all's good in da hood so let's sit the fuck down and have cookies.

[Paradoxxx_]

Re: Simplex FULL

inb4 someone asks, the CSS one doesn't inject. Nor does the COD4 one.

[Atex]

Re: Simplex FULL

Will you be cracking the future versions or something?

[Forza1]

Re: Simplex FULL

I tested both CSS and MW3 on my VM when I originally cracked it a few weeks ago. Possible that there has been an update or something but they're definitely valid DLL's and should work with any public injector. Possibly Atex, I haven't decided yet. Most likely not simply because it's not worth it in my opinion, Avaster is going to continue blaming others when anything bad happens to avoid taking responsibility himself. I would hope the free market sorts that problem out on its own. I may though, I just don't really know at this point. I'm very busy and I try not to think about or worry over Simplex but when I'm constantly hearing lies being told about myself it reaches a limit.

[Tom]

Re: Simplex FULL

Your location is Britain but surely English isn't your first language? Let's go through the list...

-You say I claim to have leaked these cheats implying that I didn't do it myself. Well, do you see them anywhere else on the internet? Do you know of anyone else that has cracked them? Do you think that someone else cracked them and just gave me "permission" to post them AND take credit for them? Clearly I cracked them myself.

-You also say that I claim I can code quite sarcastically. Well, first of all I never claimed that a single time. Cracking cheats take far more reverse engineering skills than coding skills. However, believe it or not, I can code. Do you visit any other cheat sites or are you stuck in the RoyalHack bubble? Nearly any known coder will tell you I know what I'm doing.

-How does posting a cracked cheat in "HL2 Engine Games" make any more sense than posting in the "Leaked" forum of the "Coding" section? The section name is not "Source code", it's "Coding", which is a very broad subject. Posting a crack in the "Coding->Leaked" section makes FAR more sense than posting it in the "HL2 Engine Games" section. This goes back to your sub-par English.

I could go on insulting you but judging from your English skills it will most likely be a waste of energy typing so I'll just end it there.

1) I never said you didn't "Crack" or "Leak" these cheats idiot re read my comments.

2) Yes i done it sarcastically due to your inability to post your leaked hacks in the correct section. And yes i go on other cheat sites but from someone who is well known and trusted who knows what he is doing like Helios and Artificial Aiming rather than some crappy copy and paste site that will disappear in time like simplex. I have been doing this a lot longer than you kid.

3) The HL2 Engine Games section is for cheats related to the HL2 Engine = Why your thread is here because you are posting cracked hacks and not leaked source code.

4) Iv just burst your RH bubble and English is my first language and i know what iv posted makes sense and that you must just have a hard time reading it.

Tom,

[Yes!]

Re: Simplex FULL

inb4 someone asks, the CSS one doesn't inject. Nor does the COD4 one.

yes it does. used winject and injected at menu screen. works fine.

[Paradoxxx_]

Re: Simplex FULL

yes it does. used winject and injected at menu screen. works fine.

Then I failed. Thx.

EDIT : Confirmed as working.

[b2k5]

Re: Simplex FULL

HE POSTED IN THE WRONG SECTION, HE MUST BE A MAJOR IMPOSTER!

damn akn, insulting him over a mistake he made by accidentially posting in the wrong section?

[Atex]

Re: Simplex FULL

Oh btw do you happen to have tf2 crack? I would love it!

[[myg0t]BaDaZZ]

Re: Simplex FULL

sup optix. <3

and dont bother for tf2 hax, simplex doesnt have 100%crit on aimbot.

[mencore]

Re: Simplex FULL

File attached to OP's post now, it has not changed besides I zipped it since I first thought that it's why attachment manager was being a fag.

[wav]

Re: Simplex FULL

No actually Aknglock has a point.

http://www.unknowncheats.me/forum/anti-cheat-bypass/80588-vac3-v2.html

http://www.unknowncheats.me/forum/anti-cheat-bypass/80815-dumping-vac3-easy-way.html

hurr durr no vac input packet? ...

Then you don't even log output..

Also you can patch the mapping routine to create a file avoiding the need to dump. If only you had actually reversed it you'd know that.

Most epic I think is the following:

On a very random note I'm curious why it is called VAC3 by the cheating community and who decided that.

BurtonJ and the other Valve developers deciding to call it VAC3. I was like if it's good enough for BurtonJ to call it VAC3, I'll do the same.

The VAC2 module is labeled in the export directory (seen below) but VAC3 has had its name stripped (also seen below).

No shit considering I already said that on GD last year...

Anyway, VAC is now scanning for virtual tables and comparing them to the functions found in rdata so VMT hooking is no longer undetected. I haven't looked into how many tables they are looking at, I doubt it's all of them (the ones that matter anyway) but it's possible. They technically scan for 1,024 tables but that certainly doesn't mean that they're all found.

So... You basically came to that conclusion based off what ?... A couple of ascii strings in an un-xrefed func ? BRILLIANT DEDUCTIVE REASONING. I'll save you the short. The reason it's un-xrefed is IT DOESN'T WORK. One more thing, the 1024 entries you speak of is wrong too. That's a unsigned int counter incremented by guess what... UNSIGNED LONG.

Anyway since you failed to explain how it works I'll tell everyone.

typedef struct
{
	DWORD dwAddressInData;
	DWORD dwVTablePointerToRData;
	
	int iVTableSize;
}VTable_Entry_t;

DWORD DwVACScanForVTables ( PVOID pPacket, HANDLE hGameProcess, HMODULE hModuleToScan )
{
	DWORD dwAddressInData, dwDataBegin, dwDataEnd, dwIterator, dwRDataBegin, dwRDataEnd, dwTextBegin, dwTextEnd, dwSize, dwDataSize;

	DWORD dwVTablePointerToRData, dwVTableEntry, dwVTableIterator;

	DWORD dwSizeOfPacket;

	int iVTableSize;

	dwAddressInData = 0;
	dwVTableIterator = 0;
	dwVTablePointerToRData = 0;
	dwVTableEntry = 0;

	dwDataBegin = 0;
	dwDataEnd = 0;
	
	dwRDataBegin = 0;
	dwRDataEnd = 0;
	
	dwTextBegin = 0;
	dwTextEnd = 0;

	dwSize = 0;
	dwDataSize = 0;

	dwIterator = 0;

	iVTableSize = 0;

	GetSection ( hGameProcess, ( DWORD )hModuleToScan, ".data", dwDataBegin, dwDataEnd );
	GetSection ( hGameProcess, ( DWORD )hModuleToScan, ".rdata", dwRDataBegin, dwRDataEnd );
	GetSection ( hGameProcess, ( DWORD )hModuleToScan, ".text", dwTextBegin, dwTextEnd );

	dwDataSize = dwDataEnd - dwDataBegin;

	VTable_Entry_t VTable_Entry;

	memset ( &VTable_Entry, 0, sizeof ( VTable_Entry_t ) );

	dwSizeOfPacket = 0;

	do{
		for ( dwIterator = 0; dwIterator < 0x1000; dwIterator += sizeof ( DWORD ) )
		{
			dwAddressInData = ( DWORD )hModuleToScan + dwDataBegin + dwSize + dwIterator;

			if ( ReadProcessMemory ( hGameProcess, ( LPCVOID )dwAddressInData, &dwVTablePointerToRData, sizeof ( DWORD ), NULL ) )
			{
				if ( dwVTablePointerToRData >= ( ( DWORD )hModuleToScan + dwRDataBegin ) && dwVTablePointerToRData <= ( ( DWORD )hModuleToScan + dwRDataEnd ) )
				{
					// now we scan each individual vtable entry

					dwVTableIterator = 0;

					while ( 1 )
					{
						if ( ReadProcessMemory ( hGameProcess, ( LPCVOID )( dwVTablePointerToRData + dwVTableIterator ), &dwVTableEntry, sizeof ( DWORD ), NULL ) )
						{
							if ( dwVTableEntry  >= ( ( DWORD )hModuleToScan + dwTextBegin ) && dwVTableEntry <= ( ( DWORD )hModuleToScan + dwTextEnd ) )
							{
								iVTableSize++;
							}
							else
							{
								if ( iVTableSize != 0 )
								{
									printf ( "Found pGlobal To VTable: 0x%X.\n", dwAddressInData );
									printf ( "pPointer To VTable: 0x%X.\n", dwVTablePointerToRData  );
									printf ( "VTable Has %i entries.\n", iVTableSize );

									// throw your crip signs up here or some shit
									
									
									break;
								}
							}
						}

						dwVTableIterator += sizeof ( DWORD );
					}
				}
			}
		}

		dwSize += 0x1000;


	}while ( dwSize < dwDataSize );

	return dwSizeOfPacket;
}

You can even change to 1 byte increment and the same problem occurs. Phantom vtable counts.

Also your crack is a piece of shit, but we already knew that.

[Forza1]

Re: Simplex FULL

http://www.unknowncheats.me/forum/anti-cheat-bypass/80588-vac3-v2.html

http://www.unknowncheats.me/forum/anti-cheat-bypass/80815-dumping-vac3-easy-way.html

hurr durr no vac input packet? ...

Then you don't even log output..

Also you can patch the mapping routine to create a file avoiding the need to dump. If only you had actually reversed it you'd know that.

I really don't get what your point is here? Obviously that's a very 'hacky' code, I don't even play Source anymore and was already growing extremely bored with it at that point, just threw something together really fast.

The reason it's un-xrefed is IT DOESN'T WORK. One more thing, the 1024 entries you speak of is wrong too. That's a unsigned int counter incremented by guess what... UNSIGNED LONG.

So because it has no cross references that all of a sudden means it can't possibly be working? What makes you say that...?

Anyway since you failed to explain how it works I'll tell everyone.

I have known FOREVER that my explanation was wrong in that thread. Shouldn't have posted anything before spending more than a few minutes looking at it.

Also your crack is a piece of shit, but we already knew that.

Thanks, those cracks that work with no issues at all are always a bitch.

[wav]

Re: Simplex FULL

I really don't get what your point is here? Obviously that's a very 'hacky' code, I don't even play Source anymore and was already growing extremely bored with it at that point, just threw something together really fast.

zzz more bullshit please

So because it has no cross references that all of a sudden means it can't possibly be working? What makes you say that...?

BLAH BLAH more bullshit

I tested the code, it's un-xrefed BECAUSE IT DOESN'T WORK. Different vtable counts for each run. Ergo, phantom vtables. Why the fuck would you sig scan for your own code in your own anti cheat module? That's fucking stupid and dumb especially considering that Valve keeps a linked list of scan structs in the data section which hold the address of the scan function to run from the code section. I see no evidence of encryption or obfuscation as of yet except in VAC2.

I have known FOREVER that my explanation was wrong in that thread. Shouldn't have posted anything before spending more than a few minutes looking at it.

Then use the magic edit button you twit.

Thanks, those cracks that work with no issues at all are always a bitch.

You're welcome.

I am most grateful you felt obliged to man up and undelete your post so I could tear it apart.

[UnstucK]

Re: Simplex FULL

TEST____________k}j@x>Z=(%b$H6^+[*$).&;,;AeP>n^/=('*/(~/<y|%p";{Q/)|{:D,()&.X'OH'#{k<Q_#J!u_<{|P,{n*k*@<(e=ekO@&^|(t

[Tom]

Re: Simplex FULL

[Forza1]

Re: Simplex FULL

My post was originally deleted simply because I didn't feel like arguing with you. Obviously signature scanning for a function at runtime simply to remove cross references isn't a good way to go about that in the first place, it was just an example. Anyway, you don't have to prove any points here - I am happy to admit that I did not reverse that function properly when I made that post and I should have spent more than a few minutes looking at it before writing such a statement. ;) Not really sure what your hatred is towards me for something so petty in the first place, not exactly like I went telling everyone about that - it was just a single reply to an old thread on UC, but it is what it is. I clearly don't spend as much time on VAC as you do, just don't have the interest in any VAC protected games that I used to. I tried going to edit that post just for you but seems it's too old to edit now anyway, so sorry to disappoint you further. lol

[wav]

Re: Simplex FULL

My post was originally deleted simply because I didn't feel like arguing with you. Obviously signature scanning for a function at runtime simply to remove cross references isn't a good way to go about that in the first place, it was just an example. Anyway, you don't have to prove any points here - I am happy to admit that I did not reverse that function properly when I made that post and I should have spent more than a few minutes looking at it before writing such a statement. ;) Not really sure what your hatred is towards me for something so petty in the first place, not exactly like I went telling everyone about that - it was just a single reply to an old thread on UC, but it is what it is. I clearly don't spend as much time on VAC as you do, just don't have the interest in any VAC protected games that I used to. I tried going to edit that post just for you but seems it's too old to edit now anyway, so sorry to disappoint you further. lol

Saul Goodman

say it really fast and you'll get it

and Valve run shit is boring same to PB, stacking cache flow in D3 is a new prime piece of real estate big TY to Blizz for banning botters

[feAx]

Re: Simplex FULL

Yes, reversing .net application which do not contains any obsfuscation. You're going the right way, man!

[Benutzer2914]

Re: Simplex FULL

Why all always the CSS hacks from this Forum crash hl2.exe? :D please help! In private Message

[Guest]

Re: Simplex FULL

Why all always the CSS hacks from this Forum crash hl2.exe? :D please help! In private Message

Maybe you're bit slow, who knows...

[Searchy]

Re: Simplex FULL

I hope you enjoy your reward, non stop cracks until I get bored - if I get bored.
.

Where da cracks at? :D

[Legitplayer]

Re: Simplex FULL

Where da cracks at? :D

why dont you "searchy" for them, huehuehuehue :D